[SickGTR]

Originally Posted by N3M3S1S

And the GTR is a heavier car.

All about the launch! Like sleepDoc mentioned, the GTR's have been doing it for awhile. Also the tire. If you stick the launch, great numbers can be had. That's why I never drag race my F-82😝 On R888's I can run low 9's with my GTR. The 22" wheels, is a totally different story. Lol

[///BMW Junkie]

Originally Posted by edwarjejeega

Theoretically, yes. However, it would definitely need traction to do so. You save 70-100 lbs & suffer less of a drivetrain loss, even though xDrive sends 85% of its power to the rear wheels. I haven't seen a rwd one this fast 60-130, but there is one with just a custom e60 tune and downpipes running 6.2 in worse weather

On the topic of 60-130 times, getting into 4's with turbos would be awesome. Do we think full E with upgraded turbos is possible on stock fueling?

Also what do we we anticipate FBO/stock turbos do 60-130 on full E?

[edwarjejeega]

Originally Posted by ///BMW Junkie

On the topic of 60-130 times, getting into 4's with turbos would be awesome. Do we think full E with upgraded turbos is possible on stock fueling?

Also what do we we anticipate FBO/stock turbos do 60-130 on full E?

I'm not an expert on this topic by any means, but as development keeps progressing, more parts are available and revisions are being made similar to the S55 platform, I wouldn't doubt it will be a 9.7 @ 141-142 mph car max effort.

Gtp_motorsport on IG just added port injection and dyno'd the car again since the last time (Custom Tuned, Downpipes, E50) = 740 hp / 748 lb-ft = 6.2 60-130 in 60° F & 1300 FT DA

Now just adding port injection, E65 it dyno'd 800 hp / 775 lb ft = 5.9x 60-130 in around the same or slightly better weather? We will see!! They're still going to run full e85 soon and post the final results

[edwarjejeega]

Originally Posted by ///BMW Junkie

On the topic of 60-130 times, getting into 4's with turbos would be awesome. Do we think full E with upgraded turbos is possible on stock fueling?

Also what do we we anticipate FBO/stock turbos do 60-130 on full E?

Stock fueling 4's no way. But with pure turbo and fueling/E85 I wouldn't doubt high 4's, definitely low 5's with full interior.

[///BMW Junkie]

Thanks.

If really 740/748 at the wheels, I honestly expected much better than 6.2 🤷🏼

Didn't the 9.9 1/4 run do like 5.9 60-130 with less power?

[///BMW Junkie]

Originally Posted by edwarjejeega

Stock fueling 4's no way. But with pure turbo and fueling/E85 I wouldn't doubt high 4's, definitely low 5's with full interior.

Not that time necessarily, just the ability to run full E with Pures and stock fueling. You would max it S55 with E50 easily

[edwarjejeega]

Originally Posted by ///BMW Junkie

Thanks.

If really 740/748 at the wheels, I honestly expected much better than 6.2 🤷🏼*♂️

Didn't the 9.9 1/4 run to like 5.9 60-130 with less power?

740 crank, so he had 637 whp / 640 wtq on the 6.2 run/setup. The 9 second m4 is give or take 640-650 awhp if I had to guess.

He ran 5.94s 60-130 going -0.8% downhill, with weather that's a difference of 20°F and 2000 FT DA in his favor from when the m4 ran 6.2 going slightly uphill.

So, honestly practically the same. Both would run high 5's given the weather they have there. The M4 is in California, and the weather is not so great over there in terms of maximizing performance.

Willing to bet the m4 will run 5.9x in the same weather he had in his first pass, as he's nearly 50 rwhp more than that run now.

[edwarjejeega]

Originally Posted by ///BMW Junkie

Not that time necessarily, just the ability to run full E with Pures and stock fueling. You would max it S55 with E50 easily

I don't think so, as E50 is basically pushing it already stock turbos and stock fueling. You will need port injection and my buddy was thinking M5 fuel pump too.

[///BMW Junkie]

Originally Posted by edwarjejeega

740 crank, so he had 637 whp / 640 wtq on the 6.2 run/setup. The 9 second m4 is give or take 640-650 awhp if I had to guess.

He ran 5.94s 60-130 going -0.8% downhill, with weather that's a difference of 20°F and 2000 FT DA in his favor from when the m4 ran 6.2 going slightly uphill.

So, honestly practically the same. Both would run high 5's given the weather they have there. The M4 is in California, and the weather is not so great over there in terms of maximizing performance.

Willing to bet the m4 will run 5.9x in the same weather he had in his first pass, as he's nearly 50 rwhp more than that run now.

Gotcha, 6.2 with 637/640 is solid!

[///BMW Junkie]

Originally Posted by edwarjejeega

740 crank, so he had 637 whp / 640 wtq on the 6.2 run/setup. The 9 second m4 is give or take 640-650 awhp if I had to guess.

He ran 5.94s 60-130 going -0.8% downhill, with weather that's a difference of 20°F and 2000 FT DA in his favor from when the m4 ran 6.2 going slightly uphill.

So, honestly practically the same. Both would run high 5's given the weather they have there. The M4 is in California, and the weather is not so great over there in terms of maximizing performance.

Willing to bet the m4 will run 5.9x in the same weather he had in his first pass, as he's nearly 50 rwhp more than that run now.

Gtp_motorsport car is rwd?

[GixY2K]

Originally Posted by edwarjejeega

I'm not sure what to tell you. The owner sent me the dyno of the car and it was making 677hp and 640 tq. He said it was in crank and not wheel HP.

I told them that doesn't seem right, as the car should be somewhere around 750 hp but he told me they dyno'd the exact same M4 on there stock, and made 550hp @ the crank from the factory.

I have no idea what it takes to dip into the 9s, but do you think gearing is playing a part in it? 1st really gets you out of the hole in a hurry.

Again, I'm not expert

[B58togo]

Originally Posted by CanesM4

Again...... Either they are lying about the hp or the weight or the draggy isn't accurate. That car would need way more hp to get into the 9's

So it's a pessimistic dyno. Why do you keep saying they're lying? It makes you seem rather hostile. Dragy doesn't lie. My Dragy runs are always .02 slower than my slips. This car will run 9.8x on a well prepped track, no other changes.

[CanesM4]

Originally Posted by B58togo

So it's a pessimistic dyno. Why do you keep saying they're lying? It makes you seem rather hostile. Dragy doesn't lie. My Dragy runs are always .02 slower than my slips. This car will run 9.8x on a well prepped track, no other changes.

I'm not hostile. I really don't care what the car runs but I just find it hard to believe that a 4000 lb car with 680 crank hp can get into the 9s.

[NKGK20]

Originally Posted by CanesM4

I'm not hostile. I really don't care what the car runs but I just find it hard to believe that a 4000 lb car with 680 crank hp can get into the 9s.

Just curious, what do you drive?

[CanesM4]

Originally Posted by NKGK20

Just curious, what do you drive?

2021 G82. Why does that matter? I've had several modded Z06s, a ZR1 and lots of other very fast cars.

[NKGK20]

Originally Posted by CanesM4

2021 G82. Why does that matter? I've had several modded Z06s, a ZR1 and lots of other very fast cars.

Maybe trade up for an xdrive or keep your mouth shut. You've had ample proof on this thread, and none of us really should of wasted our time trying to prove to you or show you that it's been done by more then one person several different times. You sound ignorant.

[CanesM4]

Originally Posted by NKGK20

Maybe trade up for an xdrive or keep your mouth shut. You've had ample proof on this thread, and none of us really should of wasted our time trying to prove to you or show you that it's been done by more then one person several different times. You sound ignorant.

Ooohhh.... An internet tough guy. Settle down Fuck head.

[NKGK20]

Originally Posted by CanesM4

Ooohhh.... An internet tough guy. Settle down Fuck head.

You're just dumb though. Lol.

[ChargerHellcat]

Originally Posted by NKGK20

Maybe trade up for an xdrive or keep your mouth shut. You've had ample proof on this thread, and none of us really should of wasted our time trying to prove to you or show you that it's been done by more then one person several different times. You sound ignorant.

People like you is what's wrong with this world. Keyboard warriors, gets butt hurt over a ridiculous thing. Did you create the S58 or built this car yourself????Stop getting so defensive. He's not attacking your grandmother for Christ sake.

[ChargerHellcat]

Personally I hope it's true. Power does seem low to be running 9s. I ran a similar time with over 900rwhp, my car was also 4500lbs. Let's all cheer to this platform hoping to be kicking ass and taking names. I would love to give some highly modified GTRs a run for their money.

[edwarjejeega]

Originally Posted by ChargerHellcat

Personally I hope it's true. Power does seem low to be running 9s. I ran a similar time with over 900rwhp, my car was also 4500lbs. Let's all cheer to this platform hoping to be kicking ass and taking names. I would love to give some highly modified GTRs a run for their money.

He weighed the car this morning. 3776 lbs.

[NKGK20]

Originally Posted by ChargerHellcat

People like you is what's wrong with this world. Keyboard warriors, gets butt hurt over a ridiculous thing. Did you create the S58 or built this car yourself????Stop getting so defensive. He's not attacking your grandmother for Christ sake.

He's just being dumb.. simply put. Countless videos And still in denial..you're another one, lol. I called you out on your hellcat claim with a video. You came back with I don't know about this video, he shouldn't of rolled at 50. Some stupid shit. Facts are facts man just don't be dumb. It be one thing if these were assumptions ,But they aren't. But then again y'all probably in your 20's. Anyway good talk.