10-27-2021, 02:21 PM | #46 |
Lieutenant Colonel
4262
Rep 1,623
Posts |
BMW M did a fantastic job catering to almost everyone with the current assortment of G8x.
The only (minor) miss is not giving 6MT Competition power. |
Appreciate
1
Sedan_Clan25083.50 |
10-27-2021, 02:27 PM | #47 |
________
4159
Rep 2,301
Posts |
Now all BMW needs is a Canadian special 2023 G81 Xdrive with a manual, sunroof, and bucket seats. Take my money (I'll make it easier, it does NOT have to be an xdrive).
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2021, 03:01 PM | #49 |
Second Lieutenant
626
Rep 290
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2021, 03:27 PM | #51 |
First Lieutenant
629
Rep 308
Posts |
I think the conclusion must be that both cars are very close. In the real world - normal driving - the difference is likely near zero. For me, after 6 months in my G80 competition i think i can say that BMW wasted money developing 2 versions of the M3. I think they should have just stayed with RWD for this latest version of the M3. AWD is unnecessary.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2021, 03:35 PM | #52 |
Lieutenant Colonel
3182
Rep 1,902
Posts |
Very good point. It is on CUP 2's. If you watch carwow video from a month ago where Matt ran his M3 vs. the new Golf R you can see that in some of the shots
__________________
2022 G80 M3 Comp M xDrive |
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2021, 03:38 PM | #53 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
2715
Rep 1,662
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2021, 03:46 PM | #54 | |
Second Lieutenant
154
Rep 233
Posts |
Quote:
They made the absolute daily driver for all weathers with this generation, IMHO.
__________________
Past: G82 M4 xDrive (14 jan. 2022 to / 16 mar. 2023)
Current: BMW X5 50e (Ordered 29 dec. 2023) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2021, 03:47 PM | #55 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
2715
Rep 1,662
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
2
KoenG1428.50 Sedan_Clan25083.50 |
10-27-2021, 03:51 PM | #56 | |
Major General
686
Rep 6,845
Posts
Drives: 2018 Audi RS5 coupe
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Reston, VA
|
Quote:
Or even rains I've owned several M3s, one with winter tires Sucks compared to my Audi with all seasons Like no contest Obviously if you live in Texas etc, then this becomes a moot point Does the M3 have the same rwd/awd selector like the M5? If it does there is no reason to buy the rwd, unless you really think you can detect 50kg weight saving. Also on ceramic brakes vs steel brakes I've owned 2 RS5s, first one with steel brakes, second with ceramic. Ceramic is way better than steel I've never had a situation where I was worried the car wouldn't stop quickly enough on the ceramics, I have a few times in the steel brakes But on the Rs5 the ceramics are roughly 1" bigger discs, , not sure about m3. Plus lifetime of ceramic on RS5 is roughly 3 times the life of the steel brakes, so you have to factor that into the price difference .
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
1
KoenG1428.50 |
10-27-2021, 04:51 PM | #57 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
1429
Rep 1,522
Posts |
Quote:
not entirely what you asked, but the difference for the M5 AWD vs RWD mode in the wet is H U G E! For the G8x the gap will most probably be a tiny bit smaller (50kgs weight and a cog a bit more shifted to the rear wheels for RWD). |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2021, 04:55 PM | #58 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
1429
Rep 1,522
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2021, 05:28 PM | #59 |
Captain
3634
Rep 875
Posts
Drives: ///M2
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: California
|
I think the 2nd gear launch for the RWD is a HUGE game changer. If this wasn't done it'd be a different story.
Also weather should make a difference. If you're launching it in cold conditions the AWD will obviously help. What about with more power? For those who plan on tuning their cars. It leads me to wonder how a RWD car would perform with more power & sticker rubber? Could some quality R compound tires do the trick completely? Or would the AWD difference be more apparent then?
__________________
N54 135i 6MT (FBO, JB4 reflash, E30) sold
E90 M3 DCT (FBO, tuned) sold Current: Performance Edition M2 6MT (FBO, ethanol tuned by Bend Calibration/Ecutek) |
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2021, 06:54 PM | #62 | |
First Lieutenant
237
Rep 331
Posts |
Quote:
Lower friction coefficient 2 vs 4, would obviously make a bigger difference! Ever try push a sled in the snow vs pulling it? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2021, 07:27 PM | #63 | |
2020 Z4 M40i - 2022 M4C Convt
3127
Rep 5,264
Posts
Drives: 2020 Z4 M40i - 2022 M4C Convrt
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Raleigh, NC - OIB, NC
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 1965 COBRA (FFR rep ... [8.57]
2023 Jeep Wrangler ... [9.50] 2009 Yamaha V-Star [0.00] Cars 2-BMW, 2-FORD, ... [0.00] 2023 Ford Expeditio ... [0.00] 2020 Z4 M40i [10.00] 2022 BMW M4C [7.25] 1998 FORD Ranger 4X4 [0.00] |
Quote:
Think RWD with the power available today off the showroom floor is at a dead end. Its done. Supercars are already going AWD. Great for fun & nostalgia like the 6MT but not the best plan for quickness. First gear starts would make it launch worse with putting more torque into the same tires that are not holding traction now. Ever see a Hellcat try a hard launch on street tires? Tire change will not change the game since the AWD can also run better tires, end result will be the same.
__________________
Kevin
Dravit Gray, Black Leather, Moonlight Roof, Red Calipers 2022 M4C - 2020 Z4 M40i - 2023 FORD Expedition XLT Max 4X4 400BHP - 2009 V-Star - 1998 Ranger 4X4 5MT - 1965 Cobra (R) 5MT - 2023 Jeep Wrangler Sport S 6MT Last edited by BEAR-AvHistory; 10-27-2021 at 07:35 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
1
Gfit2714.50 |
10-27-2021, 08:48 PM | #64 |
Private First Class
293
Rep 164
Posts |
Simply, the AWD G8X is better than the RWD G8x. But I wouldn't trade my RWD G82 for an AWD…
But, I may have an issue resisting the 2023 C8 ZO6 Corvette: 1. 760HP(most HP from a naturally aspirated V8 production engine in history) 2. Estimates 2.5 0-60 3. Estimated $90,000 price point This may be my next vehicle of choice…🤔 |
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2021, 09:06 PM | #66 | |
Captain
957
Rep 779
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2022 M3 Xdrive Frozen Dark Grey - 4/27.
2016 Charger Hellcat - 908 RWHP & 988 WTQ 9.9@ 140 - 2012 - Charger SRT 392 - Sold 2009 - Charger SRT 6.1 - Sold |
|
Appreciate
1
Gfit2714.50 |
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|