12-03-2023, 07:46 AM | #353 |
New Member
32
Rep 29
Posts |
Has anyone tried a 20x11 +15 square setup? I compared with a wheel fitment calculator and it would only have 1 mm less inner clearance than running the OEM rear wheels (20x10.5 +20) up front, and outer clearance is the same as those running the 20x10 +15 with a 12 mm spacer (which it seems some are doing successfully). I assume it would be tight up front (and would likely rub on the fender liners) and finding the right tire size would be key, but seems like it could potentially work. Just curious if anyone has tried it?
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-13-2024, 05:24 PM | #354 | |
JY01
679
Rep 298
Posts |
Quote:
Second pic is the rear wheel up front, and third is the front. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-14-2024, 06:01 AM | #355 | |
New Member
32
Rep 29
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-15-2024, 01:30 PM | #356 |
JY01
679
Rep 298
Posts |
Just an update, I tried bolting the 11” wheel with 295 tire on the front but the sidewall sticks out too much and hits the shock. I think you’d need at least a 5mm spacer or a narrower tire.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2024, 03:07 PM | #357 |
DHS
169
Rep 3,973
Posts
Drives: 2023 M4, 2020 Land Rover
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Disneyland
|
I am running TE37s with custom offsets with a 20x10 +8 front and 20x11 +10 rears with a 275 and 295 tire and lowered front and rear and don’t rub at all. I could also run a 305 rear tire. You could probably run 295s up front in a square setup. I should have tried it but it’s flush as is. I could run a 285 front tire and wouldn’t rub as well.
You could run a 285 square tire on a 20x10 setup or 10.5 setup. |
Appreciate
1
OGOverkill154.00 |
03-25-2024, 11:29 AM | #358 | |
Private
93
Rep 94
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
OGOverkill154.00 |
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|