04-15-2021, 02:46 AM | #24 |
Major General
3486
Rep 9,709
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2021, 04:36 AM | #25 | |
Car enthusiast
149
Rep 55
Posts |
Quote:
the claimed time for 0-100km/h is 4.3 sec for F80 MT. So same time as for G80 MT. Claimed time for 0-200 km/h is indeed 13.6 sec for F80 MT but, F80 MT needs 14.5 sec for 0-200 km/h, according to ZePerfs (3 measures). In summary the G80 MT has nearly the same acceleration performance (hardly better) as F80 MT. Despite more powerful ( 480 PS vs 431 PS), the G80 MT is heavier (even if it is less heavier than initially anticipated from the claimed weights). SCx (resistance to air penetration) plays obviously also a role at high speeds but I need to figure out the values for G80 and F80 respectively. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2021, 07:58 AM | #26 | ||
Colonel
352
Rep 2,176
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
04-16-2021, 02:07 AM | #27 | |
Major
2621
Rep 1,477
Posts
Drives: BMW M2
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Zurich
|
Quote:
F80: https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/...hnische-daten/ G80: Same magazine, same car specs (manual, CCB) |
|
Appreciate
1
CanAutM321104.50 |
04-16-2021, 02:10 AM | #28 |
Major
2621
Rep 1,477
Posts
Drives: BMW M2
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Zurich
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-17-2021, 08:31 AM | #29 |
Major General
2725
Rep 6,750
Posts |
I was going to say this but didn’t want to be the first. Granted this guys is a Hockenheim specialist and all that, but a little extra smoothness and less oversteer (and understeer) cannot harm, can they?
__________________
2018 F80 Santorini 2019 Z4 3.0i 2022 X2 M35i |
Appreciate
0
|
04-17-2021, 10:43 AM | #30 | |
Major General
3486
Rep 9,709
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|