09-30-2021, 05:50 PM | #23 |
Major General
3427
Rep 6,770
Posts
Drives: 2016 BMW i8
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Monarch Beach
iTrader: (1)
Garage List 2012 BMW e92 M3 [0.00]
2021 BMW X5M [10.00] 2015 Porsche 991 Tu ... [10.00] 2015 Porsche 991 GT3 [10.00] |
Altitude can positively affect performance in certain scenarios. The air is less dense and therefore less drag. The half mile event speed records set by Underground Racing happened at altitude at Colorado at the Shift Sector event in Colorado Springs.
When a turbocharger of a turbo motor is at its efficiency limit at sea level, it will lose power at elevation. However if a turbocharger is no where near peak efficiency at sea level and then goes to a high altitude, insofar as the turbocharger is within its efficiency levels and if the ECU is sophisticated enough to read density altitude, the ECU will compensate for the oxygen difference and request more boost to yield equal power as sea level. Therefore, as long as there is more "room" in the turbocharger, it can compensate by providing higher boost pressures (which means it is pushing more air molecules) to maintain the same power as sea level. Coupled with less aerodynamic drag, can produce better accel results at altitude.
__________________
Current BMWs: 2022 X5 40i, 2016 X5 50i
2015 Porsche 991 Turbo S 1979 Porsche 911 Turbo (930) a couple others IG: longboarder949; YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCT1...eoFBszPIK0gf9w |
Appreciate
5
|
09-30-2021, 06:25 PM | #24 |
Second Lieutenant
106
Rep 258
Posts
Drives: M235
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aurora CO
|
For comparison, In IL, my modded M235 AWD, best I got was 3.95s to 60, 12.1 1/4 but avg was 4.1/12.3. Now, at 6150 ft in colorado and same measuring equipment, my best is 4.3/12.8 but most are 13.0. I'm easily losing .7s at altitude, I'm shocked you hit those numbers at 6400', very impressive
|
09-30-2021, 07:54 PM | #25 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
824
Rep 1,584
Posts |
Quote:
You lose air *density* at altitude, increasing boost pressure will compensate and all modern BMW turbo engines have plenty of headroom to compensate for several thousand feet of elevation and hit their advertised power and performance figures. The fact that the original poster in this thread got such quick acceleration figures is another point of proof. If you're wondering why all modern BMWs seem to be "underrated" and make "so much" power on a chassis dyno, it's usually because the dyno operator is adding a weather correction factor on top of a car whose ECU has already compensated for the weather and has not lost much, or any, power compared to what it's rated for. |
|
Appreciate
4
|
10-01-2021, 03:22 AM | #26 |
Lieutenant Colonel
4257
Rep 1,623
Posts |
Regardless of the theory, we’ve already observed slightly better performance with the G80 at lower altitude/DA. Both 0-60 and 1/4 mile times are 0.2-0.3 seconds better than these results in optimal conditions.
It’s definitely very good news that performance doesn’t degrade significantly, even over a mile up. |
10-01-2021, 06:44 AM | #27 | |
New Member
11
Rep 17
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
10-01-2021, 07:55 AM | #28 | |
Second Lieutenant
281
Rep 241
Posts
Drives: BMW M4 DCT Coupe
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Surrey, United Kingdom
|
Quote:
That's regardless of any benefit they derive from reduced drag (which in an F1 car aero can be significant, which is why they have the DRS in the rear wing to aid overtaking). The loss of air density directly affects power, but in their case also has a knock on effect on the energy recovery systems for the hybrid system. |
|
Appreciate
1
forza19763396.50 |
10-01-2021, 07:57 AM | #29 |
Second Lieutenant
281
Rep 241
Posts
Drives: BMW M4 DCT Coupe
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Surrey, United Kingdom
|
Those are definitely good times, but the thing that really stood out to me are the 0 - 100 & 0 - 120, those are pretty much supercar levels of performance from not so long ago (sub-11 to 120, is slightly faster than a 997 Turbo)!
|
10-01-2021, 10:50 AM | #30 |
Lieutenant General
7484
Rep 12,305
Posts |
It blows my mind that a 4 door sedan that can carry at least 4 people in comfort, as well as their luggage (while getting half decent fuel economy if you're careful) can be as quick as hyper cars I grew up with in a straight line.
__________________
Current:
16 F82 M4 GTS, Black Sapphire/Black, DCT 08 E92 M3, Sparkling Graphite/Bamboo Beige, 6MT 07 E85 Z4M Roadster, Alpine White/Red, 6MT 99 E36 M3, Techno Violet/Dove Grey, 6MT |
10-01-2021, 01:39 PM | #31 | |
Major General
3487
Rep 9,709
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
Longboarder3427.00 |
10-02-2021, 07:39 AM | #32 |
Brigadier General
914
Rep 3,456
Posts
Drives: Harrop E90 M3
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Colorado Springs
|
|
Appreciate
1
Limegrntaln13408.00 |
10-02-2021, 07:46 AM | #33 | |
Brigadier General
914
Rep 3,456
Posts
Drives: Harrop E90 M3
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Colorado Springs
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
forza19763396.50 |
10-06-2021, 04:39 PM | #35 |
Captain
468
Rep 609
Posts |
Garrett knows a bit about turbocharging. They state altitude has little to no affect on turbocharged cars unless they are at absolute max pressure already--as another poster noted. The M3/4 should be within a tenth at 7000' of what they would be at sea level. Air temperature has more impact than simple AGL elevation on performance, as well. Even in NA engines, 100 degree temps at SL run less power than 75 degrees at 5000'.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|