BMW M3 and M4 - The Icons
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts
home
Technical Sections Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust / Bolt-ons / Tuning

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      02-01-2021, 09:07 PM   #1
mmwwhats
New Member
6
Rep
26
Posts

Drives: m235 xdrive
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: OH

iTrader: (0)

G82 M4 Fuel Economy

I'm trying to understand why/how the new M3/M4 has worse fuel economy than the current gen car? I have an M2C and was thinking about moving to the new M4, but am scratching my head and these numbers: 16 city 23 hwy for the G82 M4, 18 city 25 hey for the F82 M4 F87 M2C. I know it's a powerful car and all, but in 2021, I'd expect to be able to have performance and economy at the same time. At the very least, I wouldn't expect the car to take a step backwards in fuel economy. I'd appreciate any insight, thoughts, or knowledge on the matter... and if it's at all possible to avoid the "if you want MPGs buy a Prius" comments, that'd be swell.
Appreciate 0
      02-02-2021, 08:42 AM   #2
Benjamin
Private
Benjamin's Avatar
United_States
6
Rep
94
Posts

Drives: Camry
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: IL

iTrader: (0)

Has to be the tune, any turbo engine will get worse fuel economy the more boost the engine gets. If your on a casual 2 lane cruise I'm sure it will still return low 30s as long as you are going 55 in 6th
Appreciate 1
nathanm4682.00
      02-02-2021, 10:44 AM   #3
SickGTR
Banned
1082
Rep
949
Posts

Drives: 1000whpGTR/ F-82 YAS
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Dirt Jerz

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benjamin View Post
Has to be the tune, any turbo engine will get worse fuel economy the more boost the engine gets. If your on a casual 2 lane cruise I'm sure it will still return low 30s as long as you are going 55 in 6th
Exactly. If you drive it like a mad man ( Which i Do and Recommend ) then yes, your economy will blow. If you putz around the town, it will be better than what they are saying. Switch to E-85 for a few months, then 16 a mile will seem like the best thing ever
Appreciate 1
SYT_Shadow11478.00
      02-02-2021, 03:26 PM   #4
Benjamin
Private
Benjamin's Avatar
United_States
6
Rep
94
Posts

Drives: Camry
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: IL

iTrader: (0)

If you are doing some pre dawn back road/highway loops you can burn over 10 gallons in under an hour easy. Sometimes people road trip and get 33MPG.
Appreciate 0
      02-03-2021, 03:22 PM   #5
rak299
Major
United_States
601
Rep
1,047
Posts

Drives: 2021 M3 6MT
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: san francisco

iTrader: (0)

I live in San Francisco and do a fair amount of city driving up and down hills, stop and go. My gas mileage will probably suck and be worse than any estimates, even though I drive like an old fart. If that were my primary consideration, I would drive a Prius.
Appreciate 1
      02-11-2021, 04:52 PM   #6
Boiler Up!
Private First Class
United_States
294
Rep
195
Posts

Drives: 2021 M5C
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: NWI

iTrader: (0)

Weight: ~10% heavier = ~10% lower fuel economy
Appreciate 1
Got f1?681.00
      02-18-2021, 11:58 AM   #7
Insane_Dawe
Private First Class
47
Rep
130
Posts

Drives: 18 White ZCP M3
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Chicago

iTrader: (1)

If you look into the details of the S58, it's closer to an upgraded S55 than the B58(Amazingly Efficient).

The B58 has a longer stroke, less bore and much higher compression than even the S55. While the S58 is same bore and stroke as the S55 but less compression. That is more of a traditional "boosted" engine setup, less CR, bigger turbo, more boost PSI. Less efficient but more reliable. Granted the the S58 does have newer valvetronic 4.

That and as mentioned, weight and probably some aero.

Last edited by Insane_Dawe; 02-18-2021 at 01:27 PM..
Appreciate 0
      02-18-2021, 12:51 PM   #8
Lo2
Private
Hong Kong
62
Rep
71
Posts

Drives: .
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hong Kong

iTrader: (0)

The G80/G82 utilizes a S58O engine and the competition models utilizes a S58T engine. It shares the same turbos as the F97 X3M and F98 X4M which has the S58 engine.

Minus the weight and more aero on the G80/G82 versus the F97/F98, its a bit better in fuel economy.

Comparing the F80/F82 towards the G80/G82, the latter is heavier in weight alone.

Read more here

https://www.bmwblog.com/2020/09/23/b...82-vs-g80-g82/
Appreciate 0
      02-22-2021, 07:45 PM   #9
heavyD^2
Colonel
heavyD^2's Avatar
Canada
3689
Rep
2,956
Posts

Drives: X3M Competition
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Too close to Santa

iTrader: (0)

I'm getting 18.3 mpg on my X3M Competition in the city which isn't too bad. Better than my 5.0L Mustang or STI and those cars weren't remotely as powerful.
Appreciate 0
      02-23-2021, 03:37 AM   #10
maddmatth
Major
New Zealand
555
Rep
922
Posts

Drives: F82 M4, E92 335i
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: New Zealand

iTrader: (0)

Thought efficiency was their cited reason for dumping the DCT for the ZF Auto. I guess they needed to counteract some of the efficiency they lost with the added weight...
Appreciate 0
      02-27-2021, 08:31 PM   #11
N1rve
Racecar Driver
N1rve's Avatar
No_Country
1285
Rep
1,951
Posts

Drives: BMW M4
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Beverly Hills, California

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
2019 BMW M4  [9.63]
It’s probably due to the weight gain of like 300~500 pounds.

As I’ve stated before, feels like this generation was a cost cutting one and more engineering went into the F8X.

However!! You don’t buy these cars for miles per gallons but for smiles per gallons! 😁😁😁
Appreciate 0
      03-15-2021, 08:34 AM   #12
nathanm4
Captain
nathanm4's Avatar
United_States
682
Rep
738
Posts

Drives: Aston Martin Vantage
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Salt Lake City, UT

iTrader: (0)

Cruise control set at 85 MPH on 6th gear on highway, average MPG was 24 MPG, never even reached 25 MPG.

Yes, it's worse than F8X.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      03-19-2021, 03:42 PM   #13
SickGTR
Banned
1082
Rep
949
Posts

Drives: 1000whpGTR/ F-82 YAS
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Dirt Jerz

iTrader: (0)

Why would peeps expect better fuel milage than the F models? More horsepower normally needs more fuel.
Appreciate 0
      03-20-2021, 02:12 AM   #14
TigahRouge
Private First Class
TigahRouge's Avatar
No_Country
293
Rep
164
Posts

Drives: G05X5,G82C, Ram 1500
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Northern California

iTrader: (0)

The fuel economy is terrible for my G82. But I will say that the engine is very edgy and seemingly always ready to pounce!! There are no docile settings. Even when set to the the softest settings the engine is still eager.

Saying all that to say this...the G82 is no Prius. It feels like a sports car all of the time. This translates to poor fuel economy.

The bright side of this equation is the car is special, and it feels special at all times. If you are looking for a mild mannered dual personality automobile this ain't that. The G82 is an event every time you get behind the wheel!!
Appreciate 0
      03-20-2021, 11:33 AM   #15
Machtavian
Private
61
Rep
56
Posts

Drives: F80
Join Date: May 2017
Location: NorCal

iTrader: (0)

More weight equally more ponies to feed!
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:31 AM.




g80
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST