Quote:
Originally Posted by coreyjn7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic55
Quote:
Originally Posted by coreyjn7
Thats not factually correct, the drop difference on a g82 is different due to axle weights, which is why the MSS and KW kits have a bigger drop on the M4.
Also no relevance to the "part number" you claimed had to be for a G82 because it happened to start with G82
|
Ok Ill keep it civilized for you and the members, please show me this axle weight difference and also please tell me why H&R itself would not list the correct drops. Could it be possible, just possible since you are so well versed in this topic, that H&R made the G82 spring different. The part numbers are different too.
I have this G80 and clearly .4 wont cut it so Im going to use HAS springs as H&R has such a variation. Also I had an F90 M5 and used H&R and yep, their site said .4 inches and yep, it dropped it a paltry .4 inches:
 |
I'm not sure what you aren't getting, For someone who is a self proclaimed genius you seem to struggle to explain how you've come up with your analysis.
Does the G80 have a shorter or softer spring than the G82 or are they the same? I doubt you know and neither do I at this point. However i'm going to assume using logic that the same springs are used on both cars, there is differing proportions as one a sedan and one is a coupe resulting in a minor difference in how weight is distributed and that is why there is a variance in the drop
The whole point of this was that a different H&R spring could be fitted to achieve a better height rather than the 0.4" drop one you continuously post about. I'm genuinely unsure what you are trying to achieve. It is pretty simple for H&R to supply an alternate spring rate or length at a customers request, they are a suspension company after all |
Take a look at 'the stance shop' on Instagram, based in Queens. They have been dropping tonnes of G80's using the H&R spring kits and they are very low at the back, more than low enough and definitely more than .4