Quote:
Originally Posted by Asymmetrick
In these conditions, neither car shone very bright in my opinion. That is why "reviews" conducted in poor conditions are not very informative.
As argued in my post above, if you want to race in cold+rain and on rough surfaces (i.e., "lousy, treacherous conditions" to use your words), there is no need to pay for a GT3 or CSL. It's wiser to stick to a mid-range sports car.
|
I would tend to disagree. While testing on a wet track is pointless for objective metrics such as lap times, it can however be very informative from a subjective perspective. Wet conditions enhance the overall handling characteristics of a vehicle and are very telling on how it behaves a the limit. I personally love driving on a wet track, every lap is a different experience
(I however hate the paddock portion of wet track days
)