Quote:
Originally Posted by KoenG
50/50 is better no doubt, but I'am not so certain that this mildly skewed distribution will make a lot of difference. In comparo with Audi which carry +60% in the front, 53% is still rather neutral I'd presume. It will however allow for a bit higher entry speed in the braking phase, and allow sooner acceleration on apex on the exit phase. The cost of this is a gently more understeered character when you aim at the apex.
Also prepare for their video still to be released where they will explain the smaller front wheels vs rear, providing the opportunity for a significant 'higher' tire providing a more progressive turn in and make it less sensitive to directional jerk. Also the wider front track will help clearly to build more directional prowess.
Damn, I hope I'am not converting to a fan already, reading my own post.  |
Actually, contrary to what BMW wants us to believe, 50/50 is not "ideal" for handling dynamics. It is a question of polar moment of inertia: the farther the center of gravity resides relative to the rear axle, the greater the force needed from the front tires to get the car to change direction. There is a reason why all great sports and race cars have a rear weight bias. And yes, a 1~2% shift is significant.