View Single Post
      05-16-2020, 12:36 PM   #31
Imola3
Second Lieutenant
Imola3's Avatar
324
Rep
237
Posts

Drives: Mk.7 Golf R
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Miami

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by XsltAnalyst View Post
Well I put together a table of past caranddriver tests and here are my estimates below for upcoming G8x. I think it'll have almost same performance stats as current 911 S.

Btw, 0-60 is just a single data point and doesn't tell a lot in these days. Many low hp cars can get to 60 around 4 seconds thanks to turbos and efficient gearboxes but many run out of steam afterwards because of power deficit. That's why I look at 0-100, 0-150 mph results, and I look at delta between 0-60 test and 5-60 test for turbo lag (EVs suffer the least in this)

Just for s. and giggles, I added two supercars to the list. You can see how much faster 720s compared to Huracan at high speeds even though 0-60 tells the opposite. Although Lambo and Mclaren both even until 100MPH, 720s disappears into stratosphere above 100MPH. For mclaren, It takes 17.5s to reach 180MPH while huracan needs another 5.7 seconds to reach that speed.

3,850lbs for the all wheel drive version? According to the difference between the 340 with Xdrive and without that means that the non Xdrive M3 will weigh 120 lbs less.

So 3730lbs, compared to the F80 which according to C&D weighs ~3,500lbs.

How the hell is this car gaining 200lbs+?
__________________
Instagram @V5Garage
Appreciate 1
solstice5456.50