Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanWRT
11.7 is slow (but that's for traction) so is the gt3's 11.4 (that's really engine incompetence). The CSL or even the comp should walk away from the gt3 no questions about it. The 4.0L NA shows its age.
Carwow never understood the importance of showing trap speed. So the drag races of theirs have always been not high quality from a technical perspective.
|
I think these cars are totally different tools. They are based on gt cars (at least the Porsche) where they are limited by balance of performance (bop) (the actual group gt3 rules) and these cars are built to closely match that. Light weight and less power or more weight with more power as long as the bop formula is adhered to, some manufacturers use lower end torque with turbos while some use high revs for power.
The 4.0 N.A. is perfect. Nothing about its age is showing. You can get the 3.8 turbo s but the car has to weigh more for the group gt3 class, however there is a car built for just more power and less weight the gt2rs, you can get a car with more aero and maintain the bop but break the assisted adjusted aero rules (gt3rs).